Skip to main content
That’s no way to get the measure of a man
That’s no way to get the measure of a man
It’s surprising that the Guardian’s litany of criticisms of Iran (Editorial,
5 August) did not include any reference to its hostility towards Israel
the “Zionist entity”, whose existence it refuses to recognise and whose
enemies it supports.
Disappointingly, none of the writers reflecting on Indian partition (Midnight’s grandchildren,
Review, 5 August) seemed to question the need for partition. Was it
really necessary, as Jinnah believed, to divide India into two nations?
On reading the excellent article by Aditya Chakrabortty on Britain
ripping off its own citizens for the benefit of foreign investors (Opinion,
4 August), I kept feeling I had seen this story before. Of course! This
is what Britain did to its colonies for the benefit of investors at
home. How the wheel turns.
The smallest common pipistrelle bat,
with a head-body length of 36-51mm (and extremely small ones at 33mm are
possible), is the smallest European bat and is smaller than the pygmy
shrew (Letters, 1 August), which has a head-body length of 40-64mm.
After a brief discussion with my wife about the ongoing debate quantifying male ejaculation (Letters, 5 August), I have been told in no uncertain terms to keep my hands, and anything else, away from our measuring jug.
Eight times a week? Fourteen
gallons? Fourteen litres? Twenty litres? 6,370 ejaculations per
lifetime? The figures given for ejaculation statistics differ wildly but
surely, as between all these numbers, it’s appropriate for there to be a
vas deferens?
Read More...
Comments
Post a Comment